🔗 Share this article

This is slightly embarrassing to reveal, but here goes. Several titles sit beside my bed, each only partly finished. Inside my mobile device, I'm midway through thirty-six audio novels, which pales alongside the nearly fifty digital books I've abandoned on my e-reader. The situation doesn't count the expanding pile of early editions near my coffee table, competing for blurbs, now that I am a established author myself.

From Persistent Finishing to Intentional Letting Go

On the surface, these stats might look to confirm recent thoughts about current attention spans. A writer observed a short while ago how simple it is to lose a individual's attention when it is fragmented by digital platforms and the constant updates. He stated: “Maybe as readers' concentration change the writing will have to adapt with them.” However as a person who once would stubbornly finish every novel I started, I now consider it a individual choice to set aside a story that I'm not in the mood for.

The Finite Time and the Wealth of Choices

I wouldn't believe that this tendency is a result of a limited attention span – rather more it stems from the feeling of life passing quickly. I've always been struck by the Benedictine maxim: “Place mortality each day in view.” One point that we each have a only limited time on this Earth was as shocking to me as to everyone. And yet at what different moment in our past have we ever had such direct availability to so many incredible works of art, at any moment we choose? A glut of treasures awaits me in any library and within any screen, and I strive to be intentional about where I direct my time. Could “DNF-ing” a story (term in the literary community for Unfinished) be not a mark of a weak intellect, but a selective one?

Selecting for Connection and Reflection

Especially at a era when book production (and therefore, acquisition) is still controlled by a particular demographic and its quandaries. Although exploring about individuals different from us can help to develop the muscle for compassion, we also read to think about our own lives and place in the society. Unless the books on the shelves better depict the identities, stories and interests of potential audiences, it might be very hard to keep their interest.

Modern Storytelling and Audience Attention

Of course, some writers are indeed successfully creating for the “contemporary focus”: the tweet-length prose of selected current novels, the tight pieces of different authors, and the quick sections of various contemporary titles are all a excellent demonstration for a more concise style and style. Additionally there is plenty of author advice geared toward grabbing a audience: refine that first sentence, polish that opening chapter, increase the tension (more! further!) and, if creating mystery, put a victim on the beginning. That guidance is entirely sound – a possible agent, editor or buyer will devote only a few limited seconds deciding whether or not to proceed. There is little reason in being contrary, like the individual on a writing course I attended who, when questioned about the storyline of their book, declared that “everything makes sense about 75% of the through the book”. No writer should put their reader through a sequence of challenges in order to be comprehended.

Creating to Be Understood and Allowing Space

And I certainly compose to be comprehended, as much as that is feasible. At times that demands holding the reader's attention, guiding them through the plot beat by economical step. At other times, I've understood, insight requires perseverance – and I must give me (along with other creators) the grace of exploring, of adding depth, of straying, until I hit upon something true. A particular author argues for the story developing innovative patterns and that, as opposed to the traditional plot structure, “alternative structures might assist us envision novel methods to make our stories vital and true, persist in producing our works fresh”.

Transformation of the Book and Modern Platforms

From that perspective, the two perspectives agree – the novel may have to evolve to suit the today's consumer, as it has constantly done since it began in the historical period (as we know it currently). Maybe, like past writers, coming creators will return to releasing in parts their novels in periodicals. The upcoming those writers may even now be releasing their content, part by part, on web-based services like those visited by many of frequent users. Art forms evolve with the times and we should permit them.

Beyond Limited Concentration

Yet do not claim that any evolutions are all because of reduced attention spans. Were that true, concise narrative compilations and flash fiction would be regarded considerably more {commercial|profitable|marketable